Posted on: 2 September 2020
Professional indemnity insurance cover for solicitors could become unsustainable if underwriters are not allowed to cancel policies where the premium is not paid, the International Underwriting Association (IUA) has warned.
The association has discussed the minimum terms and conditions of such policies with the Solicitors Regulation Authority and has now set out its concerns in an open letter to the legal industry. It calls for a right to cancel cover if premiums are not met, particularly for run-off cover, and the payment of excesses on a policy to be mandatory.
Without such measures it is likely that insurers will become more selective in the risks they accept and smaller conveyancing firms that generate lower premiums, in particular, could face a restricted choice and higher costs for professional indemnity cover.
Chris Jones, director of legal and market services, at the IUA, said: “Many solicitor firms are facing economic pressures and we have already seen an increase in requests for payment of premiums by instalments.
“Insurers have shown their willingness to work with other professions that are struggling to mitigate the short-term economic effects of Covid-19, but the complete lack of any protection around payment of premium and excesses makes it far more difficult to do this for solicitors.
“It is not proposed that there should be any change in the scope of insurance offered. Our objective is to better manage policies to ensure that solicitors pay for the cover that is being provided to them. This will benefit the market by providing long term confidence in the availability of cover and giving insurers more flexibility to develop bespoke arrangements for their clients.”
The credit risk posed for insurers by a lack of cancellation rights for non-payment of premium, which could lead to the provision of a compulsory 6 years of run-off cover for nil premium, is not seen in any other regulated profession. The current rules are contrary to established contract and insurance law principles. Neither are they required by the Financial Conduct Authority or any other regulators with an enhanced consumer protection focus.
The Solicitors Regulation Authority is attempting to mitigate the issue in the short term, for example by reviewing its supervision and enforcement processes. These efforts are welcome, but will not fundamentally address the core concerns of insurers and are unlikely to have an impact on the forthcoming renewals season in October and beyond.
Use this link to view the open letter in full.
